I had the mind boggling experience of sitting on the Fulton County Grand jury for a year (that’s the term down here, once you pass that VD). And for all you white supremacist racists out there, the majority of the most heinous crimes seem to be perpetrated (and you get Caught!) by jerkwater whitey. The bloods are still rolling the streets being petty and trifling and a shame to their race with the Latins following close behind.

2) What are the alternatives? Well a little country called the UK has professional jurors.

I would like to see changes made to the way compensation is given. Skip the $10 a day thing and the parking validation. Why not make it a tax deduction? If you are summoned and appear, get your little form and when you do your taxes you get a $100 dedeuction.

Where in the constitution do they get the power to punish people who have not broke any law? They are subverting my personal freedoms, and I have not broken any law. It is a like jailing someone, without any proof that they have committed any crime, nor have I been accused of committing a crime, and yet…they feel they have the power to forcefully remove my freedom of will. It is a form of imprisonment.

I hate those bastards.

“Of course, those who haven’t ever been summoned for jury duty most likely don’t know those little details. It’s betting on the same odds that scam emails bet on. They figure if they try it 100 times and succeed once, then it was worth it.”

“Posted by: Tim at March 1, 2006 1:54 PM”

Read the above wikipedia article and the US Constitution, you will frnd that forced Jury Duty is unconstitutional and illegal. What next put you in jail for not vote for someone. What next chop off your hand for littering, paper, chewing gum, and etc.

“The International Labour Organization (ILO) defines forced labour as “all work or service which is extracted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered himself voluntarily”"

“The word slavery is often used as a pejorative to describe any activity one finds unpleasant or distasteful. On the one hand, this means the word slavery is applied in situations where it does not technically fit the definition. On the other hand, it also means that it is often not applied in situations that do fit the definition, but where the speaker feels that everyone has a duty to perform the action. Examples of the latter might include jury duty or military conscription, where a person is compelled to perform a job and is paid much less than one would have sought for a similar job in a free market.”

Could we also say that someone could be a slave when a man can not be practical and have values when a certain person expects a man to indulge a women when he desires to be single, to slander as being homosexual.

“Please find and read at the above location, this wise person wrote about the Jury Draft, is it just another excuse for slavery, he knows it is too.

Here some wise words he wrote:

The present jury selection system is unjust and inefficient. Compulsory jury duty violates the very principle of freedom at the heart of our constitutional republic. And imposing high implicit taxes on jurors—by paying them far less than the wages at which they would voluntarily offer their services—misallocates labor and imposes a net loss on society.

The Free State should be the first to end the jury “draft” and institute an all-volunteer jury, replacing the threat of coercion with the consent of the governed.

James A. Dorn is professor of economics at Towson University and editor of the Cato Journal.
More by James A. Dorn

Justice requires that government limit itself to its legitimate functions—to protect “life, liberty, and property.” In a free society, the greatest scope should be given to the private sector—to minimize the use of force. Those principles have served America well and have attracted millions of oppressed people to our shores. But they have not always been followed.

Two obvious transgressions were slavery, abolished in 1865 by the 13th Amendment, and the military draft, abolished by Congress in 1973. The third, not so obvious, violation of our civil rights is the existing jury-selection system. It is a form of “involuntary servitude,” although not comparable to slavery or the military draft. Compulsory jury duty cannot be justified by pointing to the right of trial by jury, just as the military draft could not be justified by the power of Congress “to raise and support Armies.” It is a legitimate function of government to provide for the “common defense,” but not to compel citizens to serve.”

I think this is only fair to write:

Remember, what being expected to do causes, the problems it causes, if your rich you could afford this or volunteer.

They force the poor people and others to do this, look at the costs and problems, if you try to visit a doctor to prove you have a problem, it costs money, come from surgery for example, your still healing, they still want you, your pregnant and soon to deliver, they still want you.

The Doctor told me no problem if you sneeze and blow your nose and run out of tissue, or cough, do you think they get a fair trial with that distraction, I understand tolerance from intolerance, some people can understand while that is happening, someone’s life is in the balance of right or wrong or truth from a lies, would I miss something. What about a dress code, and babysitters, and bills to pay, apartment eviction, why should it bother them, look how much there salary is, they want you to do it for almost nothing, money does not grow on trees, its illegal to steal money to afford doing this, look at the price of gasoline, a person must have money to afford this, it takes planning and being prepared, they could say they provide everything, would you like to be force eat and sleep the way they expect you, how could it not slavery, your poor or have problems, they have power to force you by misleading you to think that its not slavery, they are blind to the US Constution and make excuses for doing it.